Malaysia has a relatively short history or past to have a historical view but it is not long enough to provide for a meaningful historiography. Indeed to phrase it in terms of historiography would be an exaggeration of the various periods in the development of the field.
Nevertheless, tracing the history of communication study is indeed important as it will contribute to an understanding of the field. Scholars in the United States have traced the history of communication from two strands, one the history of communication as deriving from mass communication and the other from speech communication. The former, that is history of mass communication studies, can be traced to start from the first World War but communication studies, coming from Speech and rhetoric’s , is said to have began earlier. Some scholars have suggested that the study on communication study to have started during the time of Aristotle and Plato. The communication study could hardly be started before the First world war, taking into consideration for both the two types of communication. Malaysia, therefore, does not have a long history to have periodical divisions of time to have a meaningful historiography, but needless, it would be possible to discern certain periods, though short in nature, that have contributed to the development of communication study in Malaysia.